Showing posts with label art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label art. Show all posts

Saturday, January 1, 2011

Fakes, Forgeries and Mysteries

by Courtney Hilden
Spoiler Alert!: Yes, even an art exhibit can have spoilers. This review reveals some of the real identities of the art featured in this exhibit.

The Detroit Institute of Arts is currently running an exhibit called "Fakes, Forgeries and Mysteries," on art forgeries of various kinds.
There is something very daring about this exhibit: most of the art featured is from the DIA itself, and they admit in this exhibit that they have not always gotten authorship of their art right, and that sometimes other scholars or museums have caught errors in their work. It is hard to imagine other art institutes proudly displaying their mistakes and discussing how these mistakes happen.
Of course, the exhibit also discusses how these mistakes get corrected, spending some time on the kind of analysis they do. The exhibit features videos featuring scientists who analyze art using things like thermoluminesce, tree rings, and paint makeup.
One of the strong things about this exhibit is that they invite patrons to see a "fake" in comparison with "the genuine article." There's something very fun about this, putting yourself in the shoes of the art expert. The exhibit adds notes to help you pick things out, but otherwise, the exhibit lets you trust your eyes.
The exhibit also discusses the art market and how to tell if something is a fake. It discusses how when a particular kind of art floods the market, this is a sign someone is making forgeries. They discuss the ways sellers of forgeries try to fool buyers, using the work of lesser known artists and making fake paperwork. It discusses the beauty of fakes, that, despite the lack of value, can be beautiful in their own way. Some of the forgeries are impressively good. Finally, the exhibit even brings up the issue of art that has been "disowned" by their artists. "Tennessee Stud," the last piece of the exhibit, illustrates this issue. The artist had made a larger piece and sent it to be cut. One of the pieces cut from it (that were not meant to be displayed) was later sold as a genuine piece of his work. So, in addition for displaying the clear fakes, the exhibit talks about pieces that were taking without permission of the artist, works "in the style of" and the art of students in workshops as the gray areas of fakes.
The last two rooms of the exhibit has the best art of the exhibit. "Tewkesberry Road" was sold to the DIA as a Degas, but later researched revealed it was by a lesser-known English artist. "Head of a King," an Egyptian fake, is the most flawless forgery, and it is hard not to admire the work that went into this piece. The exhibit also features a painting that might be the work of Van Gogh, that has not been officially listed as by him, but in comparison with another Van Gogh, it is compelling evidence.
This is one of the more original exhibits out there, with lots of interesting information and fun interactive videos and displays. It is well worth going to.

Saturday, June 19, 2010

Vincent and the Doctor

by Courtney Hilden

“Vincent and the Doctor” finds our favorite Doctor running after a monster he sees in an Van Gogh painting, dragging companion Amy along. The entire episode was about image and impression, since the episode (visually) referenced Van Gogh’s paintings and contained a machine that could take impressions of things to find what they really were.
The actor playing Van Gogh (Tony Curran) was delightful, sympathetic, elusive and intense. He has created some wonderful villains, and has such large, dark pupils it is possible to drown in them. Even so, it was hard not to think about the cartoon doppelganger of Van Gogh from Clone High. Bill Nighy, who played the art academic, was adorable and sweet. (Seriously, why didn't anyone consider him to be the new doctor?) As always, Karen Gillan brought a wonderful sense of delight and compassion, combining the best aspects of Rose and Donna. Matt Smith did a serviceable job as the Doctor. He's grown into the role, but sometimes he lacks any charisma to set him apart from previous doctors. (Though of course he has the hard job of following what might be the best doctor, David Tennant.) The episode still had tons of fun and well-delivered Doctorism, including the Doctor wondering if time really passed that slowly and in the right order. It was, as a whole, an uplifting episode less about the monster and more about art and loving life.