Showing posts with label family. Show all posts
Showing posts with label family. Show all posts

Friday, February 18, 2011

Chuck Versus the C.A.T. Squad


by Courtney Hilden

Last episode, Chuck realized that Sarah did not have the kind of family and friends to come to their wedding, so he begins to search for her colleagues from the CIA. Chuck comes across a group of girls called the C.A.T. Squad, and you know that means an episode filled with bad jokes.
Obviously the C.A.T. Squad was meant to be remind viewers of Charlie's Angels, but like so many of the sexist concepts on the show, this fell flat. Sarah's already a hottie, we get it, it's hardly as if anyone needed reminding. The only good thing was that the writers were competent enough to give each of the girls motivation, even if it was pretty two dimensional and predictable. (The Party Girl was clearly the cutest and most likeable, like a Reese Witherspoon-esque character, which of course also meant she had to be the villian.
What was the point of this episode? Of this entire storyline? What the show should be doing is exploring Sarah's past, especially since she is the second most important (and one of the more interesting and engaging) characters. Sarah deserves to have as many episodes exploring her past as Chuck as had for his. This episode just felt like a waste of our time and excuse for a bunch of sexy women to bounce around. The strengths of this show are their storylines and character development, and that is what the writers should be focusing on.

Monday, January 10, 2011

Downton Abbey: Episode 1

by Courtney Hilden
Spoiler Alert!: Some of the episode's best surprises are given away in this review.

Downton Abbey, Masterpiece Theatre's premiere show this season, centers on the title house and the two classes of citizens it contains: the elite, wealthy family and their servants. In this first episode, Robert, an Earl and patriarch, discovers two of his relatives, and heirs to the estate, have passed away aboard what is certainly but not named to be the Titanic. This causes Robert's wife Cora to try to gain part of the estate for herself and her eldest daughter, Mary, and for Robert to invite the new heir, Matthew Crawley, to the estate. Meanwhile, the "downstairs" family deals with a new servant, who, because he was wounded a war, has trouble fulfilling his duties, but much more trouble because most of the other servants treat him so poorly.
It's not as if anything is wrong with the show, it just feels very much like other movies and miniseries that also feature both the wealthy family and servants, and in fact, there doesn't seem to be anything different from this than other earlier shows. So we trend on the familiar ground of the servants and the family and their intertwining drama. The servants, of course, have the more interesting, lesser-seen drama. The family's drama has been part of so much of the Masterpiece stories and Austen adaptations as to be boring to anyone who is familiar with either. This is, after all, the same situation Mrs. Bennett was trying to prevent in Pride and Prejudice, which takes place some one hundred years before. At least in this version, the economic situation of the elite female characters is not avoided. Countess Cora spends time trying to get some money to live off of, but she is blocked even from trying to get her dowager money back out of the estate. In a system like this, the economy is structured to take from women (their bodies, ones that are forced to stay sexually monogamous) and give them nothing or close enough in return.
There are some highlights in terms of great characters. The eldest daughter, Lady Mary, shows a delightful lack of care towards her dead fiance, a perfect reminder of the love that was not present in these marriages.
The show also deserves credit for having a "lame" character. John Bates had served Robert in the "war with the Boers", and now has taken a job as Robert's valet. The show does an excellent job at depicting both how relatively fine Bates is at his job and the way the majority of servants look down on him for his disability. "Crippled" characters are few and far between on television, so it is nice to see a show that depicts him in a way that is judgemental of those who are judgemental of him.

Unfortunately, the depiction of homosexuality leaves much to be desired. Thomas, the first footman, spends time scheming (first against Bates, then later against his former lover). The other gay character spends time manipulating Thomas and Lady Mary. Gay men are not evil, and showing them this way just plays into stereotypes and homophobia.
As for the next episode, it seems obvious that the solution to the problems of the estate rest with the lawyer, Matthew Crawley. Countess Cora would be wise to enlist Crawley to figure out how to separate her money from the rest of the estate or to simply let her have it, as that is what would make both him and Cora happy.
So, even though the show manages to create sympathetic female and disabled characters, ones who are forced to fight through difficult circumstances, the show fails a rounded depiction of homosexuality. It acknowledges their difficulties of being so closeted, but tonally makes the judgement on them that they are dangerous. Coupled with the already-explored aspects of the story, Downton Abbey is somewhat admirable but in no way splendid.

Saturday, August 14, 2010

Little Dorrit

 by Courtney Hilden

Little Dorrit is one of Charles Dickens last (his eleventh, to be exact) and lesser known novels.  It follows the main character, Amy "Little" Dorrit, who, because her father is a debtor, is imprisoned in the Marshelsea Prison of London.  The story is a classic rags-to-riches story, in that the family regains their wealth, but it also twists this storyline by making sure no one is actually happier for it.  Meanwhile, Arthur Clennam, a friend of the family, is discovering that his connection to the Dorrit family is much deeper than he realized.  The novel is famously based on Dickens's own personal experience with debtor's prisons.  (His father having served time there himself.) 
There are a lot of good things happening withing Little Dorrit.  The central metaphor of the novel (the prison as existing in more ways that simply the obvious one) is explored in multiple ways.  When the Dorrit family becomes respectable once again, they become entrapped in the expectations of their class, which of course means that everyone continues to suffer, especially Little Dorrit herself, who finds it difficult to simply forget the entire beginning of her life.  Every character within the novel is imprisoned in some way or the other.  Mrs. Clennam is imprisoned to her chair and her house because of illness and old age.  Arthur Clennam is imprisoned by societal norms and his family's own poor choices.  Mr. Dorrit is imprisoned not only by his debt and later society, but by his own pride and ignorance.  Every marriage (except the last one, of Dorrit and Arthur) is a marriage of convenience, based on money and social standing; no one is in love with one another.  Many of the women within the story are imprisoned by ideas of what women should or shouldn't do.  Those female characters who stand up to those ideas are shot down and those who acquiesce are miserable. 
The novel is considered one of Dickens's most radical and severe works, and it's easy to see how much he detests certain institutions within society.  His chapter on the Circumlocution Office (meant to stand in for the British bureaucracy at large) is the sort of writing that would make Sinclair Lewis proud.
But the novel is also has troubling parts.  Little Dorrit as a character is an idealized woman of the 19th century: industrious, loyal and quiet.  She is always working for the men in her life, mostly her father, but later on for her husband, Arthur Clennam.  She never asserts her own needs, always simply doing as they demand of her, regardless of what it does to her emotionally.
The "bad girls" of the novel, the ones that are annoying, selfish, and apparently undesirable, are the ones who are more independent.  Flora, Arthur's once flame, is now a widow, and is independently wealthy.  So she's apparently not good enough for Arthur to desire anymore (or for the audience, who sees much of this novel through his eyes, despite the fact that the title is of a female character.)  Fanny, Dorrit's sister, is undesirable because she is a woman who works for herself and because she is determined to marry whomever she wants, so clearly, she must also be a catty, witchy woman, the kind that the audience is suppose to find detestable. 
Other women are demonized within the novel.  Pet spurs Clennam's affections, so clearly she has to be miserable for the rest of her life with an artist husband.  Tattycoram, a young woman treated as a slave by a family who insists they are good because they have "adopted" her, is mocked in the novel for being stupid enough to run away.  And Miss Wade, another woman, is motivated only by revenged at being jilted by her once lover.  Women are nothing more but examples of "good" and "bad" behavior, the good girls being the ones that do as they are told and the bad girls being those who somehow threaten masculinity. 

Monday, July 12, 2010

Despicable Me

by Courtney Hilden

Despicable Me
, the latest from Pixar, follows Gru, a bad guy from some Eastern European country. (I thought he was Hungarian, though I've seen others identify him as Russian.) His latest scheme is to steal the Moon, and to do so, he's decided he needs the shrink ray of Vector, another evil villain who spends time building various rays that shoot out sea life. Vector has ordered cookies from a group of girls, who Gru adopts.
At this point, you probably don't need to hear about the rest of the plot, because this is a Hollywood movie, so you can already guess that Gru will soften to the girls and then reverse his evil plan for stealing the Moon. The plot is standard, but only if you think about it. It's handled well-enough that it's easy to just sit back and smile. The art is now standard for Pixar, which is not to say it's bad, but it isn't game-changing. It mostly just is.
This is not to say that there are some interesting flourishes along the way, because there are.
The opening scene, including the American family on a trip to Egypt, merit an entire movie in their own right, maybe one following their trips around the world. Pharrell Williams, the more famous member of the duo the Neptunes, is given credit for scoring the music. The song he recorded for the movie is delightful. It combines a Hitchcockian beat with a slight side of gangster. Pharrell should consider doing more music for movies, because he's clearly talented at doing more than remixes and making great dance songs. There was even an on-the-nose joke likening Lehman Brothers to the fictional Bank of Evil, a rare shoutout at current events.